首页> 外文OA文献 >Supplemental sampling for digital soil mapping based on prediction uncertainty from both the feature domain and the spatial domain
【2h】

Supplemental sampling for digital soil mapping based on prediction uncertainty from both the feature domain and the spatial domain

机译:supplemental sampling for digital soil mapping based on prediction uncertainty from both the feature domain and the spatial domain

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper presents an uncertainty-directed sampling method that can be used to design additional samples for soil mapping. The method is based on uncertainty from both the feature domain (the domain of relationships with environmental covariates) and the spatial domain (the domain of spatial autocorrelation). Existing soil samples are also taken into account. The method comprises three steps: 1) the selection of a ranked list of additional sample locations based on uncertainty from the feature domain using individual predictive soil mapping (iPSM); 2) the selection of a ranked list of additional sample locations based on uncertainty from the spatial domain using ordinary kriging; 3) the determination of a final ranked list created by merging the ranked lists from steps 1) and 2) based on both uncertainties. To evaluate the method, the three lists were used to map soil organic matter (SOM) in a 299.14 km(2) study area near Fuyang city in the northwest region of Zhejiang Province, China. The mapping accuracy of each list was then calculated and used to assess the effectiveness of the method. Compared with the sampling scheme based on the uncertainty from either the feature domain or the spatial domain alone, the root-mean-squared error (RMSE), with the addition of the final list based on both uncertainties, was found to be the smallest, ranging from 0.829 to 1.126, and the agreement coefficient (AC) was the largest, ranging from 0.634 to 0.737. This confirms that sampling based on two uncertainties is better than sampling based on uncertainty from either the feature domain or the spatial domain alone. The results suggest that the proposed combined additional sampling method is more effective for sampling additional points in soil mapping. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:本文提出了一种不确定性导向的采样方法,可用于设计用于土壤测绘的其他样本。该方法基于特征域(与环境协变量的关系域)和空间域(空间自相关域)的不确定性。还考虑了现有的土壤样品。该方法包括三个步骤:1)使用个体预测性土壤测绘(iPSM)基于来自特征域的不确定性,选择附加样本位置的排序列表; 2)使用普通克里金法基于来自空间域的不确定性,选择附加样本位置的排序列表; 3)基于两个不确定性,通过合并步骤1)和2)中的排名列表来确定最终排名列表。为了评估该方法,使用了三个列表来绘制中国浙江省西北部富阳市附近299.14 km(2)研究区域中的土壤有机质(SOM)。然后计算每个列表的映射精度,并将其用于评估该方法的有效性。与仅基于特征域或空间域的不确定性的采样方案相比,发现均方根误差(RMSE)加上基于这两个不确定性的最终列表是最小的,范围从0.829到1.126,协议系数(AC)最大,从0.634到0.737。这证实了基于两个不确定性的采样比基于仅来自特征域或空间域的不确定性的采样更好。结果表明,所提出的组合附加采样方法对于土壤测绘中的附加点采样更为有效。 (C)2016由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号